Dilution vs. Source Capture

Comparing energy costs, performance, and indoor air quality.

Plan your next project with help from our applications engineers

Source Capture provided by PoolPak results in up to

savings per year

which could represent as high as

cost savings over a 15 year lifespan

this is more than

the cost of new equipment

The difference between Dilution and Source Capture

1. Indoor Air Quality Comparison

No Air Movement

Chloramines are 4 times denser than air, leading them to settle on the pool surface or “breathing zone”, like a layer of scum, in the absence of any air disturbance.

Dilution/100% Outside Air

The Dilution approach to indoor air quality requires bringing in large volumes of outside air, targeting the pool surface. This causes the chloramine layer to be disturbed and absorbed into the rest of the room, leading to poor indoor air quality (IAQ). The chloramines are then partially exhausted.

Source Capture

Source Capture introduces a gentle air current at the pool surface level, which exhausts the chloramine-laden air “at the source”, without distributing the chloramines throughout the pool room. Dehumidifiers manufactured by PoolPak can be specified with the Source Capture ready option.

2. Effect of Source Capture on Nitrogen Trichloride (NCL3) at a YMCA by Purdue University

Using Source Capture rapidly brings trichloramine levels well below the safe range as determined by the World Health Organization (WHO)

*Paddock Pool Equipment Company, Inc. Study of Source Capture of Airborne Chloramines. Paddock Pool Equipment Company, Inc., 2010. PDF.

3. Cost Savings Analysis

Operating costs for natural ventilation dehumidifiers are heavily affected by climate. Operating cost savings of source capture are driven by extremely high energy costs associated with dilution which requires bringing in far more outside air (OA) than the code requires, while still requiring the aid of a compressor in most climates. Calculations are based on ASHRAE climate data

0.4% DB/MCWB​

Edit
Dilution (constant outside air)Dilution (constant outside air and compressor)Source capture (compressor and optimized ventilation )Compressor HPAnnual savings% reduction using source capture
Denver$ 66,952$ 70,034$ 43,48120$ 26,55340%
Minneapolis$ 66,213$ 68,830$ 47,80146$ 21,02932%
Washington DC$ 62,558$ 65,640$ 45,83646$ 19,80432%
Chicago$ 64,493$ 66,945$ 46,61146$ 20,33432%
Atlanta$ 59,464$ 66,845$ 45,35338$ 21,49236%
Dallas$ 57,979$ 65,360$ 45,30838$ 20,05235%
Boston$ 60,363$ 61,476$ 42,23630$ 19,24032%
Los Angeles$ 58,405$ 58,617$ 37,90420$ 20,71335%
Average$ 62,053.38$ 65,468.38$ 44,316.25Average reduction using source capture$ 21,152.1334%

5 Common Myths of the Dilution Approach

The following myths used to sell 100% outside air (OA) can cost you money, yield dissapointing IAQ, and overall comfort.

The Benefits of the Source Capture Approach

The dilution air approach was mostly abandoned in the 80s when people discovered the compressorized approach to controlling their space delivered more reliable results and saved energy. Source capture delivers superior indoor air quality without the need for bringing in more outside air than the code requires.

Reduced Operating Costs

Reduce energy costs by 1/3 compared to constant OA systems.

Reduced Maintenance Costs

When you dramatically reduce the corrosive chemical levels you save money on associated maintenance issues.

Reduced Carbon Footprint

This system has the smallest energy footprint, reducing your carbon footprint to the absolute minimum.

Improved IAQ

With an integrated source capture solution, effectively removes chemicals from the source.

Peak Performance

Your athletes will perform at their absolute best when swimming in a better environment.

Green Dehumidification Design

This system has the lowest refrigerant charge in the industry.